网络安全 Analyzing Docker Container Forensics

Model: minimax-m3 | ¥0.20/call

网络安全Claude Opus 4.7安全审计AnalyzingDocker

Analyzing Docker Container Forensics：网络安全 skill: analyzing-docker-container-forensics，适用于安全分析、取证与威胁排查场景。

Calls: 1

Skill Documentation

网络安全 Analyzing Docker Container Forensics

摘要

Analyzing Docker Container Forensics：网络安全 skill: analyzing-docker-container-forensics，适用于安全分析、取证与威胁排查场景。

> 来源: mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills (18k stars) — 网络安全专业技能集

> 原文件: skills/analyzing-docker-container-forensics/SKILL.md

> 模型推荐: claude-opus-4-7 (安全分析深度推理)

这个 skill 是干嘛的

mukul975 整理的 100+ 个网络安全专业 skill,覆盖渗透测试 / 取证 / 威胁情报 / 合规审计 / 云安全 / 移动安全等领域。每个 skill 对应一个具体的安全分析任务。

michael 强调"skill 要有相应的指导功能,指导用户使用",所以加了下面两节让 Agent 和用户对接。

---

🤖 Agent 使用说明

1. 用户提到"分析 X 日志 / 取证 / 检测威胁 / 渗透测试 / 安全审计"时,触发对应 skill

2. skill 会按操作步骤一步步执行(取证镜像 / 解析日志 / 跑威胁情报 / etc.)

3. 涉及破坏性操作(rm/drop/format)前必须 ask user 确认

4. 完工后让 Agent 跑自检 step

5. 如果用户要求做"防御性分析" — 区分恶意代码审计 vs 渗透测试

👤 用户需要做什么?

1. 告诉 Agent 你要做什么(分析日志 / 取证 / 安全审计 / 渗透测试)

2. 如果需要提供文件/镜像/日志/哈希,按 Agent 提示提供

3. 涉及破坏性操作时明确告诉 Agent"继续"或"取消"

4. 全程 Agent 自动化,你只需提供数据 + 回答决策点

---

原 skill 内容(mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/skills/analyzing-docker-container-forensics/SKILL.md,截断到 12k chars)

---

name: analyzing-docker-container-forensics

description: Investigate compromised Docker containers by analyzing images, layers,

volumes, logs, and runtime artifacts to identify malicious activity and evidence.

domain: cybersecurity

subdomain: digital-forensics

tags:

forensics
docker
container-forensics
container-security
image-analysis
runtime-investigation

version: '1.0'

author: mahipal

license: Apache-2.0

nist_csf:

RS.AN-03
DE.AE-02
RS.MA-01

mitre_attack:

T1610
T1611
T1613
T1612

---

Analyzing Docker Container Forensics

When to Use

When investigating a compromised Docker container or container host
For analyzing malicious Docker images pulled from registries
During incident response involving containerized application breaches
When examining container escape attempts or privilege escalation
For auditing container configurations and identifying misconfigurations

Prerequisites

Docker CLI access on the forensic workstation
Access to the Docker host file system (forensic image or live)
Understanding of Docker layered file system (overlay2, aufs)
dive, docker-explorer, or container-diff for image analysis
Knowledge of Docker daemon configuration and socket security
Trivy or Grype for vulnerability scanning of container images

Workflow

Step 1: Preserve Container State and Evidence

# List all containers (including stopped)
docker ps -a --no-trunc > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_list.txt

# Inspect the compromised container
CONTAINER_ID="abc123def456"
docker inspect $CONTAINER_ID > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_inspect.json

# Export container filesystem as tarball (preserves current state)
docker export $CONTAINER_ID > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_export.tar

# Create an image from the container's current state
docker commit $CONTAINER_ID forensic-evidence:case-2024-001
docker save forensic-evidence:case-2024-001 > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_image.tar

# Capture container logs
docker logs $CONTAINER_ID --timestamps > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_logs.txt 2>&1

# Capture running processes (if container is still running)
docker top $CONTAINER_ID > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_processes.txt

# Capture network connections
docker exec $CONTAINER_ID netstat -tlnp 2>/dev/null > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_network.txt

# Copy specific files from the container
docker cp $CONTAINER_ID:/var/log/ /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_var_log/
docker cp $CONTAINER_ID:/tmp/ /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_tmp/
docker cp $CONTAINER_ID:/etc/passwd /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_passwd

# Hash all exported evidence
sha256sum /cases/case-2024-001/docker/*.tar > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/evidence_hashes.txt

Step 2: Analyze Container Image Layers

# Install dive for image layer analysis
wget https://github.com/wagoodman/dive/releases/latest/download/dive_linux_amd64.deb
sudo dpkg -i dive_linux_amd64.deb

# Analyze image layers interactively
dive forensic-evidence:case-2024-001

# Non-interactive layer analysis
dive forensic-evidence:case-2024-001 --ci --json /cases/case-2024-001/docker/dive_analysis.json

# Extract and examine individual layers
mkdir -p /cases/case-2024-001/docker/layers/
tar -xf /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_image.tar -C /cases/case-2024-001/docker/layers/

# List the image manifest and layer order
cat /cases/case-2024-001/docker/layers/manifest.json | python3 -m json.tool

# Examine each layer for changes
for layer in /cases/case-2024-001/docker/layers/*/layer.tar; do
    echo "=== Layer: $(dirname $layer | xargs basename) ==="
    tar -tf "$layer" | head -20
    echo "..."
done

# Use container-diff to compare with original base image
# Install container-diff
curl -LO https://storage.googleapis.com/container-diff/latest/container-diff-linux-amd64
chmod +x container-diff-linux-amd64

# Compare committed image with original
./container-diff-linux-amd64 diff daemon://nginx:latest daemon://forensic-evidence:case-2024-001 \
   --type=file --type=apt --type=history --json \
   > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_diff.json

Step 3: Examine Docker Host Artifacts

# Docker data directory (default: /var/lib/docker/)
DOCKER_ROOT="/mnt/evidence/var/lib/docker"

# Examine overlay2 filesystem layers
ls -la $DOCKER_ROOT/overlay2/

# Find the container's merged filesystem
CONTAINER_HASH=$(docker inspect $CONTAINER_ID --format '{{.GraphDriver.Data.MergedDir}}' 2>/dev/null)
# Or manually from forensic image:
# Look in /var/lib/docker/containers/<container_id>/config.v2.json

# Analyze container configuration files
cat $DOCKER_ROOT/containers/$CONTAINER_ID/config.v2.json | python3 -m json.tool \
   > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_config.json

# Check Docker daemon configuration
cat /mnt/evidence/etc/docker/daemon.json 2>/dev/null > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/daemon_config.json

# Examine Docker events log
cat $DOCKER_ROOT/containers/$CONTAINER_ID/*.log > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_json_logs.txt

# Check for volume mounts (potential host filesystem access)
python3 << 'PYEOF'
import json

with open('/cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_inspect.json') as f:
    data = json.load(f)

inspect = data[0] if isinstance(data, list) else data

print("=== CONTAINER SECURITY ANALYSIS ===\n")

# Check mounts
print("Volume Mounts:")
for mount in inspect.get('Mounts', []):
    rw = "READ-WRITE" if mount.get('RW') else "READ-ONLY"
    print(f"  {mount.get('Source', 'N/A')} -> {mount.get('Destination', 'N/A')} ({rw})")
    if mount.get('Source') in ('/', '/etc', '/var', '/root') and mount.get('RW'):
        print(f"    WARNING: Sensitive host path mounted read-write!")

# Check privileged mode
host_config = inspect.get('HostConfig', {})
if host_config.get('Privileged'):
    print("\nWARNING: Container was running in PRIVILEGED mode!")

# Check capabilities
cap_add = host_config.get('CapAdd', [])
if cap_add:
    print(f"\nAdded Capabilities: {cap_add}")
    dangerous_caps = ['SYS_ADMIN', 'SYS_PTRACE', 'NET_ADMIN', 'SYS_MODULE']
    for cap in cap_add:
        if cap in dangerous_caps:
            print(f"  WARNING: Dangerous capability: {cap}")

# Check PID namespace
if host_config.get('PidMode') == 'host':
    print("\nWARNING: Container shares host PID namespace!")

# Check network mode
if host_config.get('NetworkMode') == 'host':
    print("\nWARNING: Container shares host network namespace!")

# Check user
user = inspect.get('Config', {}).get('User', 'root (default)')
print(f"\nRunning as user: {user}")

# Check environment variables for secrets
env_vars = inspect.get('Config', {}).get('Env', [])
print(f"\nEnvironment Variables: {len(env_vars)}")
for env in env_vars:
    key = env.split('=')[0]
    if any(s in key.upper() for s in ['PASSWORD', 'SECRET', 'KEY', 'TOKEN', 'CREDENTIAL']):
        print(f"  SENSITIVE: {key}=***REDACTED***")
PYEOF

Step 4: Analyze Container File System Changes

# Compare container filesystem to original image
docker diff $CONTAINER_ID > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/filesystem_changes.txt

# A = Added, C = Changed, D = Deleted
# Analyze changes
python3 << 'PYEOF'
added = []
changed = []
deleted = []

with open('/cases/case-2024-001/docker/filesystem_changes.txt') as f:
    for line in f:
        line = line.strip()
        if line.startswith('A '):
            added.append(line[2:])
        elif line.startswith('C '):
            changed.append(line[2:])
        elif line.startswith('D '):
            deleted.append(line[2:])

print(f"Files Added: {len(added)}")
print(f"Files Changed: {len(changed)}")
print(f"Files Deleted: {len(deleted)}")

# Flag suspicious additions
suspicious = [f for f in added if any(s in f for s in
    ['/tmp/', '/dev/shm/', '/root/', '.sh', '.py', '.elf', 'reverse', 'shell', 'backdoor'])]
if suspicious:
    print(f"\nSuspicious Added Files:")
    for f in suspicious:
        print(f"  {f}")

# Flag suspicious changes
sus_changed = [f for f in changed if any(s in f for s in
    ['/etc/passwd', '/etc/shadow', '/etc/crontab', '/etc/ssh', '.bashrc'])]
if sus_changed:
    print(f"\nSuspicious Changed Files:")
    for f in sus_changed:
        print(f"  {f}")
PYEOF

# Extract and examine the container export
mkdir -p /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_fs/
tar -xf /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_export.tar -C /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_fs/

# Scan for webshells and malicious files
find /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_fs/tmp/ -type f -exec file {} \;
find /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_fs/ -name "*.php" -newer /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_fs/etc/hostname

Step 5: Scan for Vulnerabilities and Generate Report

# Scan the image for known vulnerabilities
trivy image forensic-evidence:case-2024-001 \
   --format json \
   --output /cases/case-2024-001/docker/vulnerability_scan.json

# Scan the exported filesystem
trivy fs /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_fs/ \
   --format table \
   --output /cases/case-2024-001/docker/fs_vulnerabilities.txt

# Check for secrets in the image
trivy image forensic-evidence:case-2024-001 \
   --scanners secret \
   --format json \
   --output /cases/case-2024-001/docker/secrets_scan.json

Key Concepts

| Concept | Description |

|---------|-------------|

| Image layers | Read-only filesystem layers stacked to form the container image |

| overlay2 | Default Docker storage driver using union filesystem for layers |

| Container diff | Comparison of runtime filesystem changes against the original image |

| Privileged mode | Container with full host capabilities (bypasses most isolation) |

| Docker socket | Unix socket (/var/run/docker.sock) controlling the Docker daemon |

| Container escape | Technique for breaking out of container isolation to the host |

| Volume mounts | Host filesystem paths made accessible inside the container |

| Image history | Record of Dockerfile instructions used to build each layer |

Tools & Systems

| Tool | Purpose |

|------|---------|

| docker inspect | Detailed container configuration and state information |

| docker diff | Show filesystem changes made in a running/stopped container |

| dive | Interactive Docker image layer analysis tool |

| container-diff | Google tool for comparing container image contents |

| Trivy | Vulnerability scanner for container images and filesystems |

| docker-explorer | Forensic tool for offline Docker artifact analysis |

| Sysdig | Container runtime security monitoring and forensics |

| Falco | Runtime threat detection for containers and Kubernetes |

Common Scenarios

**Scenario 1: Web Application Container Compromise**

Export the container filesystem, identify webshells in web root, analyze access logs for exploitation attempts, check for added files and modified configurations, examine network connections for C2 communication, review container capabilities for escalation paths.

**Scenario 2: Supply Chain Attack via Malicious Image**

Analyze image layers with dive to identify which layer added malicious content, compare with the official base image using container-diff, check image history for suspicious RUN commands, scan for embedded backdoors and cryptocurrency miners, trace the image pull from registry logs.

**Scenario 3: Container Escape Investigation**

Check if container ran privileged or with dangerous capabilities, examine host filesystem mount points for unauthorized access, review Docker socket mount enabling Docker-in-Docker abuse, analyze host system logs for container escape indicators, check for kernel exploit artifacts.

**Scenario 4: Cryptojacking in Container Environment**

Identify high-CPU containers, export and analyze the container image for mining binaries, check for unauthorized images in the registry, review container creation events for rogue deployments, examine network connections for mining pool communications.

Output Format

Docker

## 常见问题（FAQ）

## 使用「Analyzing Dock」这个 skill 能解决什么问题?
本 skill 专注于Analyzing Dock，网络安全 skill: analyzing-docker-container-forensics。它将相关流程标准化，帮助用户更快拿到可靠结果，减少重复手工操作。

## 什么情况下适合使用「Analyzing Dock」?
当你需要在Analyzing Docker Container Forensics相关工作中获得稳定、可复用的产出时最适合——无论是单次任务还是纳入日常工作流，都能直接调用。

## 使用「Analyzing Dock」前需要准备什么?
需要明确授权范围内的目标系统或样本文件，并准备隔离的分析环境（虚拟机/沙箱）。

Open AIMS China Panel